Muhuri and Others v Kiriu and Others (Civil Appeal No. 28 of 1968)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal held that a partnership agreement to operate a transport business under a road service licence issued to one partner was neither illegal in itself nor incapable of lawful performance. Where the licensed partner managed the business on behalf of the partnership, no contravention of the Transport Licensing Act occurred. The appeal was dismissed.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court ruling affirmed
Facts
In 1959, Godfrey Muhuri applied for and obtained a road service licence under the Transport Licensing Act. He invited others to contribute money to purchase a bus for operating a transport service under the licence, with contributors to receive proportionate shares of profits. Muhuri was to manage the business. This arrangement constituted a partnership. The bus was purchased and registered in Muhuri's name, and the licence was issued in his name. The business operated, and the original bus was later sold and replaced with another, again registered in Muhuri's name. A dispute arose among the partners, and some sued for dissolution of the partnership and sale of assets. The defendants raised a preliminary objection that the partnership agreement was illegal or could not be performed without contravening the Transport Licensing Act. The High Court rejected this defence, and the defendants appealed.
Issues
- Whether the partnership agreement was illegal in itself.
- Whether the partnership agreement, though legal in itself, could only be performed in a manner contrary to the Transport Licensing Act and was therefore unenforceable.
- Whether operation of a transport business by a partnership under a road service licence issued to one partner alone contravened section 4(1)(b) of the Transport Licensing Act.
- Whether use of a partnership-owned bus under a licence issued to one partner contravened section 5(5)(a)(i) of the Transport Licensing Act.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
- Decision of Miles J. in Mwangi v Mwangi overruled.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Transport Licensing Act s.4(1)(b)
- Transport Licensing Act s.5(5)(a)(i)
- Transport Licensing Act s.12
- Transport Licensing Act s.14
- Transport Licensing Act s.16
- Transport Licensing Act s.17
Cases cited (1)
- Mwangi v. Mwangi, Civil Case No. 1303 of 1961
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.