Mukasa v APAS Financial Service Limited (Civil Appeal No. 056 of 2012)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court struck out the appeal as incompetent for being filed seven months out of time without leave. Section 79(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, which excludes time taken to obtain the record, applies only where the appellant became aware of the decision within the 30-day limitation period and promptly requested the record. The appellant, having learned of the dismissal in December 2011, two months after the event, was already time-barred and was required to apply for extension of time under s.96 before filing the memorandum of appeal.
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent; no determination on merits
Facts
The appellant's suit in the Chief Magistrate's Court at Mukono was dismissed under Order 17 r.4 of the Civil Procedure Rules on 26 September 2011 due to the appellant's non-appearance. The appellant first wrote to the trial court on 15 December 2011 requesting proceedings to enable him to file an appeal. He received the record in April 2012 and filed the memorandum of appeal on 26 April 2012, seven months after the decree. The appellant did not apply for extension of time to file the appeal out of time. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the appeal was filed outside the 30-day limitation period prescribed by s.79 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Issues
- Whether the appeal was filed out of time and therefore incompetent.
- Whether the appellant's failure to file within 30 days was excused by delay in obtaining the trial record.
- Whether the appellant was required to file an application for extension of time to appeal.
Orders
- Appeal struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
- Civil Procedure Act s.79
- Civil Procedure Act s.79(3)
- Civil Procedure Act s.96
- Civil Procedure Rules O.17 r.4
- Civil Procedure Rules O.44 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.44 r.2
- Civil Procedure Rules O.44 r.3
- Civil Procedure Rules O.21 r.7
Cases cited (1)
- Albert Kifusa v Suzan Kifusa (1982) 1 LSD
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.