Mukhaye & Another v Kinyajui & 2 Others (Civil Suit 47 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that the 1st defendant driver owed a duty of care to the deceased motorcyclist and the 1st plaintiff, which he breached by failing to exercise reasonable care in a busy area, causing the death of the deceased and serious injuries to the 1st plaintiff. The 2nd defendant employer was held vicariously liable for the driver's negligence committed in the course of employment. The court awarded damages totaling UGX 191,000,000 comprising loss of dependency, loss of life expectation, pain and suffering, special damages, and general damages for the 1st plaintiff's permanent injuries and loss of employment.
Outcome
Judgment entered in favour of plaintiffs with total damages of UGX 191,000,000 plus interest at 8% and costs against the 2nd defendant
Facts
On 25 January 2021 at approximately 8:00 hours, the deceased Khabala Makyeme Lawrence (aged 45, a deputy head teacher) was riding motorcycle UBN 684G carrying the 1st plaintiff Mukhaye Judith along Mbale-Tororo Road near Total Petrol Station when they were struck by a trailer (Reg. No. KBS 804K) driven by the 1st defendant and owned by the 2nd defendant. The deceased sustained severe injuries and died two days later on 27 January 2021 at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital. The 1st plaintiff suffered a left tibular fracture requiring metallic implants, was hospitalized until 16 February 2021, and became permanently disabled and unable to work. Police investigation found no mechanical defects in the trailer and the road was in good condition. The deceased left behind two widows and 16 dependents. The 1st plaintiff, aged 27 and earning UGX 800,000 monthly as a store manager, lost her employment due to her injuries.
Issues
- Whether the late Khabala Makyeme Lawrence and the 1st Plaintiff were knocked negligently?
- Whether the defendants are liable?
- What are the remedies available to the plaintiffs in the circumstance?
Orders
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the Plaintiffs UGX 54,000,000 for loss of dependency.
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the Plaintiffs UGX 50,000,000 for loss of life.
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the Plaintiffs UGX 10,000,000 for pain and suffering.
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the Plaintiffs UGX 27,000,000 for special damages.
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the 1st Plaintiff UGX 50,000,000 for general damages.
- The 2nd Defendant shall pay the above amounts at 8% interest from the date of this judgment to payment in full.
- Costs of this suit are awarded to the Plaintiffs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (11)
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap 289 s.5
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap 289 s.6(2)
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap 289 s.8
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 9 rules 5, 8, 10 and 20
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 14
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.26(2)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.27
- Evidence Act Cap 8 s.101
- Evidence Act Cap 8 s.102
- Evidence Act Cap 8 s.103
Cases cited (11)
- Miller v Minister of Pensions (1947) 2 All ER 372
- Mugisha Felix and Others v Attorney General (Civil Suit No. 237 of 2019)
- Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
- Tart v Chitty & Co (1931) All ER 826
- Okupa v Attorney General and 13 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 14 of 2005) [2018] UGHCCD 10
- Uganda Electricity Board v GW Musoke (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 30 of 1993)
- Jane Gaffa v Francis X.S. Hatega [1981] HCB 55
- Agnes Mujaju v Makerere University and Another (High Court Civil Suit No. 548 of 2001)
- Uganda Telecom Ltd v Tanzanite Corporation [2005] 2 EA 341
- Kifamunte v Uganda [2002] 1 EA 197
- Mohanlal Kakubhai Radia v Warid Telecom Ltd (High Court Civil Suit No. 234 of 2011)
Cases citing this judgment (3)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.