Mulagwe v Bank of Uganda (Civil Miscellaneous Appeal 27 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that Bank of Uganda lawfully converted foreign currency seized from judgment debtor into Uganda Shillings under its statutory mandate to avoid demonetization losses. The applicable exchange rate is the rate at the time of breach of contract (2003), not the date of the garnishee order nisi. Appeal dismissed; garnishee order absolute for UGX 168,482,970 upheld.
Outcome
Garnishee order absolute for UGX 168,482,970 upheld; Appellant's claim for enhanced amount dismissed
Facts
The Appellant obtained judgment against Lanex Forex Bureau Limited for USD 160,000 plus taxed costs of USD 12,800. In November 2005, Bank of Uganda seized various foreign currencies from Lanex Forex Bureau's premises totaling approximately UGX 200,000,000. In December 2013, following a court restraining order, Bank of Uganda converted the foreign currencies to Uganda Shillings at the prevailing rate, resulting in UGX 168,482,970. The Appellant obtained a garnishee order nisi seeking to attach these funds. The Deputy Registrar granted a garnishee order absolute for UGX 168,482,970. The Appellant appealed, arguing the conversion was illegal and that the amount should be enhanced to UGX 220,539,678 based on the exchange rate at the date of the garnishee order nisi in 2022.
Issues
- Whether the Respondent illegally converted foreign currency held pursuant to court order into Uganda Shillings.
- Whether the appropriate exchange rate for conversion was the rate at the date of conversion (2014) or the rate at the date of the garnishee order nisi (2022).
- Whether the learned Registrar erred in awarding UGX 168,482,970 instead of UGX 220,539,678.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Decision of the learned Deputy Registrar upheld.
- Garnishee order absolute for UGX 168,482,970 confirmed.
- Costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
Cases cited (1)
- Di Ferdinando v Simon, Smits [1920] 3 KB 409
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.