Mulindwa Samuel v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 41 of 2000)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 3 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that conviction stands where reliable identification and possession of recently stolen property connect the accused to the robbery, an identification parade being unnecessary.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Mulindwa Samuel applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.