Mulindwa v Mande (Civil Suit 13 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court revoked letters of administration granted to the defendant for concealing beneficiaries and obtaining the grant while an earlier grant to the Administrator General subsisted. The plaintiff's claim for 120 acres was barred by limitation. Both parties' registrations on estate land were cancelled as fraudulent, having been procured before proper distribution and filing of inventory. The Administrator General remains the estate administrator and must distribute the estate within two months.
Outcome
Letters of administration revoked; both parties' fraudulent registrations cancelled; estate properties revert to deceased's name; Administrator General to distribute estate within two months
Facts
The plaintiff, legal representative of the late Costa Nagawa's estate, sued the defendant who had obtained letters of administration to the estate of the late Dominiko Sajjabi in 2008. The plaintiff claimed the defendant fraudulently concealed that Costa Nagawa was a beneficiary, obtained the grant while an earlier 1989 grant to the Administrator General subsisted, and failed to file an inventory. The plaintiff sought revocation of the grant and claimed 120 acres allegedly donated to Costa Nagawa in 1972. The defendant counterclaimed that the plaintiff and Costa Nagawa fraudulently registered Buddu Block 45 Plot 13 in their names in 1989 without proper transfer from the Administrator General. The defendant admitted omitting to disclose Costa Nagawa but claimed it was an honest mistake as he only listed surviving children in 2008.
Issues
- Whether there is a just cause for the revocation or annulment of letters of administration granted to the defendant?
- Whether the defendant obtained and procured letters of administration through misrepresentation and fraud?
- Whether the Late Costa Nagawa was donated 120 acres of land from Buddu Block No. 20, Plot 2?
- Whether the change of proprietorship by the plaintiff and the Late Costa Nagawa of land comprised in private Mailo Buddu Block 45 Plot 13 land at Muchunchu was done fraudulently?
- Whether the defendant/counterclaimant's registration on Buddu Block 20 Plot No. 2 into his names was fraudulent or unlawful?
- What are the remedies available to the parties?
Orders
- Both suit and counterclaim partly succeed.
- The grant of Letters of Administration to Mande Ssekiziyivu dated 28th August 2008 is hereby revoked.
- The Defendant/Counterclaimant's registration on Buddu Block 20 Plot No. 2 into his names is hereby cancelled with the effect that it reverts into the names of Ssajjabi Dominiko.
- The Plaintiff and the Late Costa Nagawa's registration on private Mailo Buddu Block 45 Plot 13 land at Muchunchu is also cancelled.
- The Administrator General is still the Administrator of the estate of the Late Dominiko Sajjabi.
- None of the properties forming part of the estate of the Late Sajjabi Dominiko have passed/been transferred to any of the beneficiaries.
- The Administrator General, by himself, or through his Assistant not being Mr. Robert Ali Bogere, who testified for the Plaintiff, shall within two months from the date of delivery of this Judgment, organize a family meeting of all the beneficiaries of the estate of the Late Dominiko Sajjabi and fully distribute the estate properties amongst the beneficiaries and file an inventory in this court.
- Each party shall bear its costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (13)
- Succession Act Cap. 162 s.234
- Succession Act Cap. 162 s.192
- Limitation Act Cap. 80 s.20
- Limitation Act Cap. 80 s.5
- Registration of Titles Act Cap. 230 s.92(1)
- Registration of Titles Act Cap. 230 s.177
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 15 r.5
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 r.28
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 r.29
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 r.30
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 7 r.1(b)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 7 r.6
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 7 r.11(d)
Cases cited (6)
- Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd (1969) EA
- Gawubira Mankupias v Katwiita Stephen (High Court Civil Appeal No. 130 of 2008)
- Fredrick J.K. Zabwe v Orient Bank & 5 Others (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2006)
- Patrick Lyamulemye v Stephen Kwiringi & 3 Others (High Court Civil Suit No. 118 of 2019)
- Auto Garage v Motokov (No. 3) (1971) EA 519
- RoseMary Kabataizibwa Lwemamu v Francis Sembuya & 2 Others (High Court Civil Suit No. 226 of 2005)
Cases citing this judgment (4)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Mushabe Solomon v Namugambe Ritah (Civil Suit 572 of 2025)
- Makasi and 13 Others v Mandala and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 36 of 2024)
- Mario Ali vs Opoka Santo (Miscellaneous Application No. 14 of 2022)
- Mande Sekiziyivu (Administrator for the estate of late Sajjabi) v Mulindwa (Miscellaneous Application No. 44 of 2021)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.