Muluuta v Kalungu Farm Limited (Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 189 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where an appeal has been filed against an entire judgment and a stay of execution granted for the whole judgment, the trial court cannot sever the judgment to allow partial execution pending appeal. The court is functus officio having granted the stay and cannot cherry-pick which portions of the judgment are executable. Application for enforcement of decree dismissed.
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the 1st Respondent
Facts
The applicant sought enforcement of a decree dated 29 May 2020 from Civil Suit No. 671 of 2014, which had revoked Letters of Administration of the estate of the late Semu Tenywa Musoke and appointed him as administrator. The decree also ordered cancellation of certain land titles and registration in the applicant's name. The 1st respondent filed Civil Appeal No. 314 of 2020 against the entire judgment and obtained a stay of execution on 11 December 2020, depositing UGX 100,000,000 as security. The applicant sought orders for surrender of duplicate certificates of title, cancellation and re-registration, and sealing of Letters of Administration. The 1st and 2nd respondents opposed on grounds that the stay of execution covered the entire judgment and that executing part of it would undermine the appeal. Several beneficiaries of the estate filed supplementary affidavits opposing the applicant's appointment as administrator.
Issues
- Whether the court can grant orders to execute parts of a judgment where a stay of execution has been granted against the entire judgment pending appeal
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs to the 1st Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Judicature Act s.33
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules O.51
- Administrator General's Act Cap 157 s.7
Cases cited (1)
- Goodman Agencies Limited v Attorney General and Hassa Agencies (k) Limited (Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2008)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.