Municipal Board of Mombasa v Karaji (Criminal Appeal No. 279 of 1950)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that second-hand goods constitute a 'store' within the meaning of by-law 9 even when retained for personal use rather than for sale. A 'store' is a stock laid up for drawing upon, and goods kept as a source of supply for the owner's transport business met this definition. The by-law's plain language imposed a restriction on establishing or maintaining stores of second-hand goods regardless of whether they were for sale. The Magistrate erred in construing the by-law as applying only to goods maintained for trading purposes.
Outcome
Acquittal set aside and matter remitted for trial to proceed in accordance with law
Facts
The respondent operated a transport business with approximately 15 lorries. On a specified plot, he kept several old lorries in various stages of dismemberment, approximately 100 tyres, and a quantity of empty paint tins. He used the plot as an open-air garage with a rough workshop under an awning. From time to time, he removed parts from the broken-down vehicles and fitted them to his operational lorries, and fitted tyres as required. He used the paint tins' contents for painting his motor trucks. The respondent never sold anything from the plot; all items were retained for use in his own transport business. The Municipal Board issued a notice requiring him to remove the store or dump of second-hand goods. He was charged with failing to comply with by-law 9 of the Mombasa Municipality (Dealers in Second-hand Goods) By-laws, 1948. The Magistrate acquitted him, finding that the goods did not constitute a store or dump within the meaning of the by-law because they were not for sale.
Issues
- Whether an accumulation of second-hand lorry parts, tyres, and paint tins kept for personal use constitutes a 'dump' or 'store' within the meaning of by-law 9 of the Mombasa Municipality (Dealers in Second-hand Goods) By-laws, 1948.
- Whether by-law 9 applies only to stores or dumps of second-hand goods maintained for sale, or whether it extends to goods kept for personal use.
- Whether the Magistrate erred in law in holding that the accused did not infringe the by-law merely because he did not sell any of the second-hand goods.
Orders
- Order of acquittal set aside.
- Case remitted to the lower Court with a direction to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Mombasa Municipality (Dealers in Second-hand Goods) By-laws 1948 by-law 9
- Municipalities Ordinance Cap. 136 s.77
- Municipalities Ordinance Cap. 136 s.77(71)
Cases cited (1)
- Fielding v Morley Corporation [1899] 1 Ch 3
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.