Home › Case law › Murisho & 5 Ors v Attorney General & Anor (Constitutional Application No. 2 of 2017)
Murisho & 5 Ors v Attorney General & Anor (Constitutional Application No. 2 of 2017)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 5 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Only a five-justice bench of the Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear injunction or stay applications; single-judge and three-judge interim orders are null and void.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Murisho & 5 Ors applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.