Musimenta V Commissioner for Land Registration (Misc. Cause No. 062 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that where a purchaser has paid the full purchase price, taken possession with the vendor's acquiescence, but cannot obtain a transfer because the registered proprietor is dead, the court may exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 98 Civil Procedure Act to grant a vesting order after the Commissioner for Land Registration has declined. The court found all statutory conditions under Section 167 Registration of Titles Act satisfied and ordered the land vested in the applicant's name.
Outcome
Vesting order granted directing Commissioner for Land Registration to vest the suit land in the applicant's name
Facts
The applicant purchased both leasehold and mailo interests in land on 4 January 2012 from Kamenge Dieudonne, paying the full purchase price. Kamenge Dieudonne held equitable ownership and provided a duplicate certificate of title and transfer forms signed by the registered proprietor, Settenda Ahmed. The applicant took immediate possession unchallenged. Kamenge Dieudonne, being a Burundian national at the time, could not transfer the mailo interest. The parties agreed transfer would occur after he acquired Ugandan citizenship. He obtained citizenship on 6 July 2018, but the original transfer forms could not be traced. Settenda Ahmed had died, making execution of fresh transfer forms impossible. The applicant applied to the Commissioner for Land Registration for a vesting order but was refused, prompting this court application.
Issues
- Whether the court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 98 Civil Procedure Act to grant a vesting order where the Commissioner for Land Registration declined to do so.
- Whether the applicant satisfied the statutory conditions under Section 167 Registration of Titles Act for a vesting order.
Orders
- The Respondent to vest land comprised in Private Mailo Kyadondo Block 94 Plot 195 and 58 at Kata into the Applicant.
- The Applicant to meet all fees necessary for vesting the suit land into her names.
- The Applicant to meet costs of this application.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (1)
- Najjemba v Mpagi (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 74 of 2005)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.