Musinguzi and Others v Rweru and Another (Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed where applicants falsely claimed they were not served with notice of judgment and were unaware of its delivery. Court found that applicants had been duly served through their lawyers and the third applicant was present in court when judgment was delivered and expressed intention to appeal. The false averments constituted an abuse of court process and the applicants failed to establish sufficient cause or were guilty of dilatory conduct in waiting six months before filing the application.
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed with costs to the respondents
Facts
The respondents obtained judgment against the applicants in Civil Suit No. 11 of 2020 before the Chief Magistrate's Court of Kyenjojo on 30 June 2023, which declared the suit land belonged to the respondents and awarded them damages, mesne profits, and a permanent injunction. The applicants sought leave to appeal out of time, claiming they were not served with notice of judgment and were unaware of its delivery. However, evidence showed that the applicants' lawyers were served with notice of judgment on 16 May 2023 for delivery on 30 June 2023, and the third applicant was present in court when judgment was delivered and expressed her wish to appeal. The application was filed on 11 January 2024, six months after judgment was delivered.
Issues
- Whether the application raises sufficient grounds for this court to grant leave to the applicants to file an appeal against the judgement in Civil Suit No. 11 of 2020 out of time.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (8)
- Aloysious Senkubuge v Samuel Kasajja (Miscellaneous Application No. 25 of 2022)
- Njagi v Munyiri [1975] EA 179
- Hadondi Daniel v Yolam Egondi (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 67 of 2003)
- Muzamil Ayile Vs Rose Tarapke & 6 Others
- Shanti v Hindocha [1973] EA 207
- Parambot Breweries (U) Ltd (In receivership) v Standard Chartered Bank & Another (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 380 of 2021)
- The Registered Trustees of the Archdiocese of Dares Salaam Vs. The Chairman Bunju Village Government & others Civil Appeal No. 147 of 2006
- Abel Balemesa Vs. Yesero Mugenyi
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.