Mutesi In Re-a debtor (Bankruptcy Petition No. 5 of 2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the filing of a bankruptcy petition by a debtor herself declaring inability to pay debts constitutes an act of bankruptcy under section 2(1)(f) of the Bankruptcy Act. A receiving order was granted in respect of the petitioner's estate notwithstanding that she had no assets, as the inquiry into her affairs would allow the Official Receiver and creditors to establish the circumstances of her insolvency. However, discharge under section 40(4) of the Civil Procedure Act must be sought from the court executing the decree, not the bankruptcy court.
Outcome
Receiving order granted; petitioner remains subject to stay of execution pending administration of estate by Official Receiver; discharge application dismissed
Facts
Maria K Mutesi was a property agent dealing in real estate in Kampala. She became a judgment debtor pursuant to a judgment in Civil Suit No. 814 of 2011 at Mengo Chief Magistrate's Court (Mushana Julius v Maria K Mutesi), owing UGX 7,216,000 in taxed costs and UGX 36,760,000 as the decreed amount. She was unable to pay this judgment debt and her efforts to persuade the judgment creditor to give her time were unsuccessful. She was arrested on 23 November 2011 pursuant to execution proceedings and committed to civil prison. She also owed three other creditors: Richard Byamugisha (UGX 11,000,000), M. Pesa Micro Finance Ltd (UGX 150,000,000), and George Okot (UGX 29,600,000). The petitioner filed a bankruptcy petition on 5 December 2011 declaring that she had no assets whatsoever and was unable to pay her debts. She also filed M.A. No. 706 of 2011 seeking stay of execution and release from civil prison pending the hearing of the bankruptcy petition, which was granted on 21 December 2011. She sought a receiving order in respect of her estate and an order of discharge.
Issues
- Whether a debtor with no assets should be granted a receiving order in respect of her estate.
- Whether a court executing a decree or the bankruptcy court should grant an order of discharge under section 40(4) of the Civil Procedure Act.
- Whether the filing of a bankruptcy petition constitutes an act of bankruptcy entitling the petitioner to a receiving order.
- Whether arrest and detention of a judgment debtor constitutes completion of execution for purposes of the Bankruptcy Act.
Orders
- Receiving order issued in respect of the petitioner's estate under section 4 of the Bankruptcy Act.
- Petition for order of discharge under section 40(4) of the Civil Procedure Act disallowed.
- Costs of the petition to be in the cause of the administration of the petitioner's estate, if any.
- Ruling to be served on the judgment creditor Mushana Julius in Mengo Chief Magistrate's Court Civil Suit No. 814 of 2011 through Birungi and Company Advocates.
- Receiving order to be served on the registrar.
- Service to be effected within two days of the ruling.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (17)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.2(1)(f)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.2(1)(g)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.2(1)(h)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.2(2)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.4
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.7(1)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.7(2)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.9
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.10
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.28(1)
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.43
- Bankruptcy Act cap 67 s.44
- Civil Procedure Act s.40(3)
- Civil Procedure Act s.40(4)
- Civil Procedure Act s.42
- Civil Procedure Act s.42(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 22 rules 34-38
Cases cited (2)
- Marley Tile Co Ltd v Burrows and Another [1978] 1 All ER 657
- Re Andrew, Official Receiver, v Standard Range and Foundry Co Ltd [1936] 3 All ER 450
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.