Mwita v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 012-2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights granted provisional measures staying execution of the applicant's death sentence pending determination of her main application. The Court held it had prima facie jurisdiction despite Tanzania's withdrawal of its Article 34(6) Declaration, as the withdrawal has no retroactive effect on pending matters and takes effect twelve months after deposit. The Court found extreme gravity and urgency existed given the irreversible nature of the death penalty.
Outcome
Provisional measures granted staying execution pending determination of main application on merits
Facts
Ghati Mwita, a Tanzanian national imprisoned at Butimba Central Prison, Mwanza, was convicted of murder by the High Court of Tanzania on 19 September 2011 and sentenced to death. The Court of Appeal upheld the sentence on 11 March 2013 and dismissed her application for review on 19 March 2015. On 24 April 2019, she filed an application with the African Court alleging violations of Articles 4, 7 and 20 of the African Charter, claiming her conviction was based on insufficient and unreliable evidence. On 29 October 2019, through court-appointed counsel, she requested provisional measures to stay execution pending determination of her application. Tanzania had deposited an instrument withdrawing its Article 34(6) Declaration on 21 November 2019. Tanzania maintained a moratorium on the death penalty since 1994 but the applicant argued nothing prevented recommencement of executions.
Issues
- Whether the Court has prima facie jurisdiction to hear the application for provisional measures.
- Whether the circumstances warrant the grant of provisional measures to stay execution of the applicant's death sentence pending determination of the main application.
Orders
- Stay execution of the death sentence handed down against the Applicant, pending the Court's determination of the Application on merits.
- Respondent State to report to the Court within Sixty (60) days of receipt of this Order, on the measures taken to implement it.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (11)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 22
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 27(2)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3(1)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5
- Rules of Court Rule 8(2)
- Rules of Court Rule 51(1)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 4
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 20
Cases cited (5)
- Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Rwanda (2016) 1 AfCLR 562
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights v Libya (Application No. 002/2013)
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights v Kenya (Application No. 006/2012)
- Komi Koutche v Republic of Benin (Application No. 020/2019)
- Armand Guehi v United Republic of Tanzania (2016) 1 AfCLR 587
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.