Nabalanza and Another v Nabitetenankinga and Another (Civil Suit 705 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the defendant fraudulently transferred land held on trust into her own name by misrepresenting herself as a purchaser when she had only power of attorney to sell and remit proceeds. The power of attorney terminated upon the death of one donor, before transfer was effected. Transfer forms violated the Illiterates Protection Act as they lacked certification that the terms were explained to illiterate donors. The court ordered cancellation of the defendant's title and registration of the plaintiffs as administrators of the deceased's estate.
Outcome
Defendant's title cancelled and suit land registered in plaintiffs' names as administrators; permanent injunction granted; general damages awarded
Facts
The late Nabanoba Deziranta and Nambooze Edrisa jointly owned land in Busiro Block 379 Plot 10. After recovering the land through litigation in 2010, Nabanoba gave the certificate of title to the defendant for safe custody. The defendant had assisted in funding the recovery litigation. On 20 October 2010, the deceased persons granted the defendant power of attorney to sell the land and remit proceeds. In January 2011, a memorandum of understanding was signed confirming this arrangement. However, on 10 February 2012, the defendant transferred the land into her own name using transfer forms dated 30 January 2011, which described the transaction as a gift and bore the thumbprints of the deceased persons. Nambooze died before the transfer was effected. Nabanoba revoked the power of attorney on 29 April 2013 and lodged a police complaint. Nabanoba died on 3 September 2013. The plaintiffs, as administrators of Nabanoba's estate, brought this suit seeking cancellation of the defendant's title.
Issues
- Whether the defendant acquired and transferred the suit land into her name fraudulently.
- Whether the defendant's power of attorney is valid after the death of the donor or not.
- Whether the registration of the defendant on the duplicate certificate of title for the deceased's land is still legal and valid.
- What are the remedies available to the parties?
Orders
- A declaration that the suit land belongs to the estate of the late Nabanooba Deziranta.
- An order directing the Registrar of Title to cancel the defendant's name from title and replace it with that of the plaintiffs as administrators of late Nabanooba Deziranta.
- A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her agents, assignees, legal representatives or transferees from any further interference and/or claim on the suit land.
- Forty million Uganda shillings (40,000,000/-) awarded as general damages.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (6)
- Fredrick Zaabwe v Orient Bank and Others (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2006)
- Kampala Bottlers Ltd v Damanico (U) Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1992)
- Gold Trust Bank (U) Ltd v Josephine Zalwango Nsimbe (High Court Civil Suit No. 226 of 1992)
- Violet Nakiwala and Others v Ezekiel Rwekibira and Another (High Court Civil Suit No. 280 of 2006)
- Miller v Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 ALL ER 372
- Storms v Hutchinson [1905] AC 515
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.