Wakilii

Nabalindwa Rosemary and Another v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application 204 of 2025)

High Court · [2026] UGHC 328 · 2026 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for extension of letters of administration and leave to file inventory out of time
Decision
Application granted with extension of letters of administration and time to file inventory for two years

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court granted an extension of letters of administration for two years where administrators demonstrated sufficient cause for delay in filing inventory due to squatters on estate property. The court held that ongoing negotiations to remove squatters constituted sufficient cause, the administrators had not been dilatory, and no injustice would result to beneficiaries from the extension.

Outcome

Application granted with extension of letters of administration and time to file inventory for two years

Facts

The applicants were granted letters of administration on 13 September 2019 for the estate of the late Bavunanyeki Daniel. They were unable to file an inventory within the statutory six-month period because the estate property had squatters who refused to vacate. The applicants engaged in ongoing negotiations to settle the squatters. The letters of administration expired on 31 May 2025 under section 337(2) of the Succession Act. The applicants sought an extension of the grant and leave to file an inventory out of time, explaining that they could not transfer the land title into the administrators' names without the extension.

Issues

  1. Whether the letters of administration granted to the applicants should be extended beyond the statutory period.
  2. Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an inventory out of time.

Orders

  • Letters of Administration for the Estate of Late Bavunanyeki Daniel issued vide Administrative Cause No. 1270 of 2018 to the Applicants are hereby extended for a period of two years effective 01 April 2026.
  • The time within which to file an inventory and final accounts of the estate of the late Bavunanyeki Daniel be extended for the same period of two years.
  • No order is made as to costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Letters of Administration — Extension of Grant — Sufficient Cause
Under section 337(4) of the Succession Act Cap 268, the court may extend the duration of letters of administration upon sufficient cause being shown by the administrator for a reasonable period determined by the court.
Letters of Administration — Extension — Test for Grant
To grant an extension of letters of administration, the court must be satisfied that the applicants have established sufficient cause for their failure to act within time, are not guilty of dilatory conduct, and no injustice will be occasioned to any beneficiaries.
Letters of Administration — Sufficient Cause — Squatters on Estate Property
The existence of squatters on estate property who refuse to vacate constitutes sufficient cause for failure to file an inventory within the prescribed time where the administrators are engaged in ongoing negotiations to remove the squatters and the delay arises from circumstances beyond their immediate control.

Legislation cited (7)

Cases cited (1)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nabalindwa Rosemary and Another v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application 204 of 2025) [2026] UGHC 328 (1 April 2026)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.