Nakalema v Kiyaga (Civil Suit 865 of 2018)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that the plaintiff possesses an equitable interest in the suit land (plot 689) arising from her late husband's estate and is entitled to special damages for rent collected by the defendant. However, given that the defendant's father constructed the building under a tenancy agreement, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff 60% of the current market value of the land and developments to prevent unjust enrichment.
Outcome
Suit partly succeeded with equitable interest declared in plaintiff's favour and special damages awarded; defendant ordered to pay 60% of current market value of land and developments
Facts
The plaintiff's late husband, Ali Bukenya, purchased plot 689 in 1977 from Fred Kayemba. After his death in 2001, the plaintiff, needing money, executed a tenancy agreement in 2008 with the defendant's father, Kizito Stephen, over plot 688. The defendant's father constructed a commercial building which, according to a survey report, sits largely on plot 689. After the defendant's father died in 2014, a lease extension agreement was executed in 2016. Subsequently, the defendant stopped paying rent and claimed ownership, asserting his father had purchased the land from the office of Namasole JN Ndibalekera. The plaintiff sought to recover rent and declare ownership of the land and developments.
Issues
- Whether the suit land and the developments thereon form part of the estate of the late Ali Bukenya
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover monies collected from tenants by the defendant since 2016
- What remedies are available to the parties
Orders
- The plaintiff has an equitable interest in the suit land arising from the estate of the late Ali Bukenya, her husband.
- The plaintiff is granted UGX 60,000,000 (sixty million) as special damages.
- The defendant shall pay 60% of the current market value of land and the developments on plot 689 to the plaintiff in 2 (two) months from the date of this Judgment.
- Registrar shall appoint a land valuer to determine current market value.
- Half of the costs are awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- Miller v Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.