Nakanjako & Ors v Segaluma & Ors (M.A No.198 of 2013)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court allowed an uncontested miscellaneous application in the Land Division where the respondents, despite being duly served, chose not to file affidavits in reply or written submissions. The court was satisfied that the application had merit based on the written submissions and authorities cited by counsel for the applicants.
Outcome
Application allowed with costs in the cause
Facts
The applicants, through their lawyers, filed a miscellaneous application arising from Civil Suit No. 103 of 2013 against the respondents. The respondents were duly served but chose not to file affidavits in reply. When the matter came up for hearing, the court directed parties to file written submissions. Counsel for the applicants complied and filed written submissions with supporting authorities within the allocated time. Counsel for the respondents ignored or neglected to file the respondents' written submissions. The application proceeded uncontested.
Orders
- Application allowed in the terms and orders being sought therein.
- Costs in the cause.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.