Wakilii

Nakeyune Rehema and Another v Kamukamu Rose and Others (Civil Suit 62 of 2021)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 688 · 2025 Preliminary Objection Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Preliminary objection raised by defendants challenging whether the plaint discloses a cause of action
Decision
Matter to proceed to hearing on the merits

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court dismissed a preliminary objection challenging whether the plaint disclosed a cause of action. Applying the test from Auto Garage v Motokov, the court held that a plaint discloses a cause of action if it shows the plaintiff enjoyed a right, that right was violated, and the defendant is liable. The court found that the plaintiffs' plaint, though lacking proper drafting niceties, sufficiently alleged they held rights in the suit kibanja which the defendants had infringed by trespass and illegal possession, thereby disclosing a substantive dispute requiring resolution on the merits.

Outcome

Matter to proceed to hearing on the merits

Facts

The plaintiffs claimed they were the biological daughter and grandson of Idi Bagaggawala, to whom the suit kibanja was donated in the 1940s. They alleged that the defendants were attempting to grab the kibanja by halting developments and planting seasonal crops, bananas, and coffee on the land. The plaintiffs contended this amounted to trespass, illegal possession, and land grabbing, denying them effective use of the property. The defendants raised a preliminary objection that the plaint did not disclose a cause of action. The plaintiffs were self-represented while the defendants were represented by counsel.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaint discloses a reasonable cause of action against the defendants.

Orders

  • Preliminary objection not sustained.
  • Civil Suit No. 62 of 2021 to be heard on its merits.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Cause of Action — Test for Disclosure
A plaint discloses a cause of action if it shows that the plaintiff enjoyed a right, that the right has been violated, and that the defendant is liable for the violation.
Civil Procedure — Preliminary Objections — Timing and Procedure
Whether a plaint discloses a cause of action is a matter of law that can be raised by the defendant as a preliminary point at the commencement of the hearing even if the point had not been pleaded in the written statement of defence.
Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Assessment of Cause of Action — Court's Approach
In determining whether a plaint discloses a cause of action, the court must consider only the plaint and any annexures without going into the merits of the suit.
Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Defective Drafting — Effect on Cause of Action
A plaint that lacks proper drafting niceties but sufficiently alleges a right, its violation, and the defendant's liability discloses a reasonable cause of action that must be resolved on the merits.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (6)

  • Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232
  • Cooke v Gill (1873) LR 8 CP 107
  • Tororo Cement Co. Ltd v Frokina International Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2001)
  • Auto Garage & Another v Motokov (No.3) (1971) EA 514
  • Serugo v Kampala City Council & Another (Supreme Court Constitutional Appeal No. 2 of 1998)
  • Baku Raphael Obudra and Others v The Attorney General (Supreme Court Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 2003)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nakeyune Rehema and Another v Kamukamu Rose and Others (Civil Suit 62 of 2021) [2025] UGHC 688 (26 June 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.