Wakilii

Nalunguju and 3 Others v Registered Trustees of Bannabikira 9Daughters of Mary ) and Another (Civil Suit 429 of 2018)

High Court · [2024] UGHCLD 96 · 2024 Suit Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Civil suit at first instance dismissed for non-compliance with court directions and failure to prosecute
Decision
Suit dismissed with costs against the plaintiffs

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit under section 17(2)(a) of the Judicature Act for unnecessary delays and failure to prosecute. The plaintiffs failed to file witness statements as directed by court on 14th February 2024, sought adjournment by letter contrary to the Constitution (Adjournment for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions 2019, and did not appear for the scheduled hearing despite being present when the hearing date was fixed. Costs were awarded to the defendants.

Outcome

Suit dismissed with costs against the plaintiffs

Facts

The plaintiffs sued as administrators of an estate against the Registered Trustees of Bannabikira and the Chief Registrar of Titles in a land matter. The case was adjourned multiple times for scheduling conference between September 2020 and October 2023. On 14th February 2024, scheduling was finally completed, documents were marked as exhibits, and witness statements were ordered to be filed by 19th March 2024 with hearing fixed for 9th April 2024. The second, third and fourth plaintiffs were present in court when this hearing date was set. On 9th April 2024, the plaintiffs' counsel did not appear but sent a letter seeking adjournment, contrary to the Practice Directions requiring oral adjournment applications. The plaintiffs failed to file witness statements as directed, and the plaintiffs who had been present when the hearing date was fixed did not attend court.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs' suit should be dismissed for failure to comply with court directions to file witness statements.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs' failure to appear at a scheduled hearing warrants dismissal of the suit.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs' suit is dismissed under section 17(2)(a) of the Judicature Act.
  • The plaintiffs shall bear the costs of the suit.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Adjournments — Manner of Seeking — Practice Directions Requiring Oral Application
Under the Constitution (Adjournment for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2019 rule 5, adjournments must be sought orally by parties to the suit or at the court's insistence and cannot be sought by letter.
Civil Procedure — Witness Statements — Mandatory Filing After Scheduling Conference
Under Order 18 rule 5A(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules as amended by Statutory Instrument 33 of 2019, the evidence of a witness shall consist of a witness statement which shall be filed after the scheduling conference on the direction of the trial judge and served upon the opposite party.
Civil Procedure — Dismissal of Suit — Non-Compliance with Court Directions and Failure to Prosecute
A suit may be dismissed under section 17(2)(a) of the Judicature Act where plaintiffs fail to comply with court directions to file witness statements, fail to appear for a scheduled hearing they attended when it was fixed, and cause unnecessary delays demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Civil Procedure — Holding Brief — Duty to Have Instructions to Proceed
Under the Constitution (Adjournment for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2019 rule 8, an advocate holding brief for another advocate shall ordinarily be expected to have instructions to proceed in the matter rather than merely seek an adjournment.

Legislation cited (6)

Cases cited (1)

  • Equator Touring Services Ltd v Kampala City Council (HCCS No. 763 of 2007)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nalunguju_and_3_Others_v_Registered_Trustees_of_Bannabikira_9Daughters_of_Mary_)_and_Another_(Civil_Suit_429_of_2018)_[2024]_UGHCLD_96_(9_April_2024)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.