Nalwanga v Jomayi Property Consultants Limited & Another (Civil Suit 63 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court held that where a purchaser paid the full purchase price for land and took possession under a sale agreement awaiting execution by the vendor, but the vendor failed to deliver certificates of title or execute the agreement, the purchaser was entitled to an order for specific performance under Contract Act s.64. The court awarded UGX 15,000,000 damages in lieu of specific performance with 20% interest per annum, rejecting the higher claim as excessive given the purchaser's undisturbed possession since the date of purchase.
Outcome
Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff with specific performance ordered within 30 days and damages awarded in lieu at 20% interest
Facts
In August 2015, the plaintiff purchased land described as Plots 1180 and 1181, Mawokota Block 31 at Bujuuko, measuring approximately 13.0 and 13.1 decimals respectively, from the first defendant at UGX 20,000,000. The plaintiff paid the full purchase price in two instalments on 20 and 25 August 2015. A sale agreement was prepared by the first defendant's official agents, which the plaintiff signed, but the second defendant as CEO of the first defendant refused to sign. The plaintiff took possession of the land and used it continuously. Despite the plaintiff's full performance, the defendants failed to deliver the certificates of title or execute the sale agreement. The defendants were served but did not attend court, and the matter proceeded exparte. The court conducted a locus in quo visit on 6 September 2024 and met the plaintiff's caretaker, who confirmed the plaintiff's quiet possession of the land.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order for specific performance for delivery of certificates of title of land comprised in Mawokota Block 31 Plots 1180 and 1181 against the defendants.
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- An order for specific performance of delivery of the certificates of title and physical possession of land comprised in Mawokota Block 31 Plots 1180 and 1181 at Bujuuko measuring approximately 13.0 and 13.1 decimals respectively together with a duly signed sale agreement within 30 days from delivery of this judgment is hereby issued.
- Damages of UGX 15,000,000 at an interest rate of 20% per annum from the date of delivery of this judgment till payment in full.
- Costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
- Contract Act 2010 s.33
- Contract Act 2010 s.64
- Contract Act 2010 s.64(1)
- Evidence Act s.101
- Evidence Act s.102
- Evidence Act s.103
- Civil Procedure Act s.26(2)
- Civil Procedure Act s.27
Cases cited (8)
- Memer Engineering Supplies Uganda Limited v Divine Light Finance Limited (Civil Suit No. 762 of 2019)
- Uganda Petroleum Co Ltd v Kampala City Council (Civil Suit No. 250 of 2005)
- United Building Services Ltd v Yofesi t/a Quickset Builders & Co Ltd (HCCS No. 154 of 2005)
- Francis Butagira v Deborah Namukasa [1992-1993] HCB 98
- Hoskins v. Black, 190 Ky. 98, 226 S.W 384, 385
- Storms v Hutchison (1905) AC 515
- Haji Asuman Mutekanga v Equator Growers (U) Ltd (SCCA No. 7 of 1995)
- Mutange Cainan v Afromix Construction Ltd & Another (Civil Suit No. 118 of 2020)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.