Namagembe v Lt. Col (Rtd) Kashilingi (Miscellaneous Appeal No. 12 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Deputy Registrar's refusal to issue execution. Where a conditional stay of execution is granted and the respondent fails to comply with the conditions, the stay automatically lapses and execution should issue. A party seeking to benefit from court process must demonstrate willingness to comply with court orders. The mere filing of a subsequent application for stay in the Court of Appeal does not constitute a stay of execution.
Outcome
Execution of decree ordered to proceed unless stayed by Court of Appeal
Facts
The appellant obtained judgment in HCCS No. 11 of 2011 on 8 February 2019 declaring her the rightful owner of land comprised in LRV 305 Folio 21 Plot 65, Kampala Road, and ordering the respondent to vacate with immediate effect and pay mesne profits of UGX 262,500,000. The respondent appealed and obtained a conditional stay of execution on 28 December 2020, requiring him to vacate the property and deposit UGX 31.5 million within 30 days, failing which the stay would automatically lapse. The respondent did not comply with these conditions. The appellant applied for execution. On 11 November 2021, the Deputy Registrar declined to issue execution on grounds that the respondent had filed an application for stay in the Court of Appeal and that execution would render the appeal nugatory. The appellant appealed the Registrar's refusal.
Issues
- Whether the Registrar erred in law and in fact when she declined to issue execution of decree in HCCS No. 11 of 2011.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- The Deputy Registrar's decision refusing to evict the respondent from Plot 65, Kampala Road is quashed and set aside.
- Execution of decree in HCCS No. 11 of 2011 shall issue against the respondent unless there is any order from the Court of Appeal staying the said execution.
- Respondent to pay costs of this application.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Civil Procedure Act s.76
- Civil Procedure Act s.79(1)(b)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.50 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.50 r.3
- Civil Procedure Rules O.50 r.4
- Civil Procedure Rules O.50 r.8
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.