Namanda v Tungakwo and Others (Miscellaneous Appeal No. 36 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that under the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2019, a Deputy Registrar has power and jurisdiction to vary or discharge an interim injunction order issued under Order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appeal challenging the Registrar's modification of an earlier interim order was dismissed with costs.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Impugned order of Deputy Registrar upheld.
Facts
The Appellant was the Plaintiff in a land suit (HCCS No. 584 of 2020) claiming ownership of land comprised in Busiro Block 411 Plot 768 at Sisa against four Respondents/Defendants. She obtained an interim order on 2 September 2020 restraining the Respondents from various dealings with the suit land. The Deputy Registrar subsequently modified that interim order on 17 November 2020, allowing ongoing construction to proceed while prohibiting new foundations and buildings, and restraining only selling and excavation. The Appellant appealed, contending the Deputy Registrar lacked power to modify her own interim order. By the time of the appeal hearing, construction had been completed and the 3rd and 4th Respondents resided on the land.
Issues
- Whether the learned Deputy Registrar had powers to vary and review her earlier interim order.
- Whether the impugned order should be set aside.
Orders
- Appeal disallowed.
- Costs awarded to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (4)
- Oscar Andreaus Cardenas Espinosa v Nakimuli Mariam Cardenas (HCMA No. 112 of 2017)
- Muhammad Buwule Kasasa v National Water & Sewarage Corporation (HCCS No. 335 of 2014)
- Attorney General v James Mark Kamoga (SCCA No. 8 of 2004)
- Giella v Cassman Brown & Co [1973] EA 358
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.