Namulindwa Justine v Asiimwe Christine and Others [2026] UGHCLD 66
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court dismissed a widow's claim that her late husband had given her and her children a kibanja and multi-storied building as a gift inter vivos. Although a handwritten deed of 11 April 2010 was proved genuine by a document examiner, its terms stated that the donees' responsibility over the property would commence after the donor's death and reserved the donor's right to alter it. The court held there was accordingly no intention to donate during the donor's lifetime and no delivery, the plaintiff never having had exclusive possession. Any interest taking effect on death is governed by the law of succession. Fraud, requiring strict pleading and proof above a mere balance of probabilities, was not established.
Outcome
Suit dismissed; suit property remains estate property of the late Baguma Emmanuel to be distributed for the benefit of all beneficiaries
Facts
The plaintiff, a widow and co-administrator of the estate of Baguma Emmanuel who died intestate on 19 April 2016, claimed that before his death the deceased gave her and three of their children a multi-storied building and the kibanja on which it stands at Ssuna Zone, Kabowa, Lubaga Division, by a handwritten deed dated 11 April 2010. The deed stated that the donees' responsibility over the property would commence after the donor's death, and reserved the donor's right to vary the arrangement if he obtained another location and built them a home. A police document examiner concluded the deceased authored the deed, and three attesting witnesses confirmed its execution. The building had housed Kabalega Primary School, which had ceased operating. The plaintiff occupied the ground floor with her children, while the other widows, their children and tenants occupied other parts of the land. In 2019 the Resident City Commissioner mediated between the widows, resulting in an agreement of 6 August 2019 to sell the property and share the proceeds, which the plaintiff refused to sign; she lodged a caveat with Buganda Land Board. She alleged the defendants acted fraudulently. The 3rd defendant died in March 2024.
Issues
- Whether the multi-storied building and the land on which it stands form part of the estate of the late Baguma Emmanuel.
- Whether the plaintiff is the owner of, and entitled to, the suit property by virtue of an alleged gift inter vivos.
- Whether the 3rd defendant was a trespasser on the suit property.
- Whether the defendants committed fraud or illegality in executing an agreement to sell the suit property.
- Whether the suit against the 3rd defendant should be struck out upon her death.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- The 3rd defendant (Namuddu Regina, deceased) and issue three in her respect are struck off the record; the suit proceeds against the 1st and 2nd defendants.
- The suit is dismissed.
- No order as to costs, all parties being family members of the late Baguma.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.20
- Civil Procedure Rules O.24 r.2
- Judicature Act s.37
Cases cited (8)
- Registered Trustees of Kampala Archdiocese v Nabitete Nnume Mixed Co-operative Ltd (Civil Suit No. 1559 of 2000)
- Joy Mukobe v Willy Wambuwa (Civil Appeal No. 55 of 2005)
- Fredrick J.K. Zaabwe v Orient Bank Ltd and 5 Others (Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2006)
- Kampala Bottlers Ltd v Damanico (U) Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1992)
- Nassozi and Another v Kalule (Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2012)
- Ereu Vincent and Others v Adebo Regina (Civil Appeal No. 76 of 2023)
- Oyet and Another v Abwola Vincent (Civil Appeal No. 68 of 2016)
- Kabuubi and Another v Kashaya and 3 Others (Civil Suit No. 385 of 2020)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.