Namulondo Getrude v Nabirye Adiya (Miscellaneous Application 327 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted the application to appoint Nabirye Adiya as administrator ad litem to represent her deceased mother Mukwanga Fatina in ongoing land litigation. The Court held that where a cause of action in land survives the death of a party and there is no legal representative willing or able to act, Letters of Administration Ad Litem may be granted for the limited purpose of continuing the suit. The Court also issued a temporary injunction to preserve the status quo of the disputed land.
Outcome
Application granted; respondent appointed administrator ad litem; temporary injunction issued to preserve status quo of disputed land
Facts
Namulondo Getrude and another filed Civil Suit No.30 of 2012 against Mukwanga Fatina and Kintu Ashraf in the Chief Magistrate's Court claiming ownership of land allegedly owned by their late father. The trial magistrate dismissed the suit on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction to cancel a certificate of title. The High Court allowed the appeal in Civil Appeal No.70 of 2016, set aside the dismissal, and ordered the matter reinstated for trial. Before the reinstated suit could proceed, Mukwanga Fatina died on 9 March 2021. No legal representative was appointed for her estate. The applicant filed this application seeking appointment of Nabirye Adiya, the deceased's daughter and a beneficiary of the estate, as administrator ad litem to represent the deceased in the ongoing litigation. The respondent admitted she was the deceased's daughter but stated she had no interest in being appointed and was not staying on the land as an administrator but as a beneficiary. The applicant contended that the respondent was constructing a permanent structure on the disputed land.
Issues
- Whether sufficient cause has been shown for the Court to exercise its discretion to grant the respondent Letters of Administration Ad Litem making her Administratrix Ad Litem and substituting the deceased 1st respondent in the underlying litigation.
Orders
- Nabirye Adiya is appointed Administrator ad litem for purposes of representing Mukwanga Fatina in Civil Suit No.30 of 2012 and for execution proceedings in Civil Appeal No.70 of 2016.
- A temporary injunction is issued against the respondent to preserve the status quo of the land in dispute until the final resolution of Civil Suit No.30 of 2012.
- The applicant is advised to file a bill of costs granted in Civil Appeal No.70 of 2016 and follow it to its logical conclusion.
- Costs of this application are awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (2)
- Okway John Kimbo v Oddi Nurru and Another (High Court Civil Suit No. 0031 of 2013)
- Samwiri Massa v Rose Achen (1978) HCB 297
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.