Namutebi v Three ways Shipping Services Uganda Limited and Another (Civil Suit No. 143 of 2008)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a contract of bailment and carriage existed between the plaintiff and the second defendant only, established by conduct when the plaintiff's agent delivered shipping documents and goods to the second defendant's Mombasa office for transportation to Kampala. The second defendant breached the contract when the goods were destroyed in transit. No evidence of negligence was established. Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant for the value of cargo, clearance charges, and investigation expenses, with interest. No cause of action established against the first defendant due to incorrect legal description and lack of evidence of contractual relationship.
Outcome
Judgment entered for plaintiff against 2nd defendant with damages, interest, and costs. No cause of action established against 1st defendant.
Facts
The plaintiff imported glass cargo from China through Mombasa Port in two containers. She engaged her agent (PW2) to arrange clearance and transportation to Kampala. The agent delivered shipping documents to the second defendant's office in Mombasa. The second defendant made booking arrangements and sub-contracted Marshland Services (K) Ltd to transport the goods. On 18 November 2007, the truck carrying the containers was involved in a fatal accident at View Point section of the Nairobi-Naivasha road. The cargo was destroyed. Marshland Services informed the second defendant, which then commissioned loss adjusters to inspect the containers. The loss adjusters assessed total loss of the cargo valued at US$ 15,063.35.
Issues
- Whether there was a contract of carriage or bailment between the plaintiff and the defendants.
- Whether the defendants breached the contract.
- Whether the defendants were negligent.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant.
- 2nd defendant to pay US$ 15,063.35 being the value of cargo.
- 2nd defendant to pay US$ 1,000 being investigation expenses.
- 2nd defendant to pay US$ 1,545 being clearance and related charges.
- 2nd defendant to pay Kenya shillings 4,550 being shipping agency charges.
- 2nd defendant to pay Kenya shillings 32,203.15 being Kenya Ports Authority charges.
- 2nd defendant to pay US$ 170 being Emirates Shipping charges.
- Interest at 20% per annum on all awarded sums from 15 November 2007 until payment in full.
- 2nd defendant to pay costs of the suit.
- Suit dismissed against 1st defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (2)
- Tumwesigye v Trans Sahara International General Trading LLC (Civil Suit No. 95 of 2005)
- Katongole v Spear Tourism and Cargo (U) Ltd (Civil Suit No. 225 of 2006)
Cases citing this judgment (2)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.