Wakilii

Nana v Mohamed Hassan (Civil Case No. 65 of 1932)

East African Court of Appeal · [1942] EACA 2 · 1942 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for custody of minor child following multiple prior applications and appeals
Decision
Application for variation of custody order dismissed; custody remains with maternal grandmother

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Questions of guardianship of minor children of Mohammedans are to be determined by the Courts of the Colony according to English law, not Mohammedan law. The court followed binding precedent establishing that while courts have jurisdiction to make custody orders, that jurisdiction is exercisable according to English law principles.

Outcome

Application for variation of custody order dismissed; custody remains with maternal grandmother

Facts

The plaintiff, a maternal grandmother, obtained custody of her grandchild Asha binti Mohammed in 1932 under Mohammedan law. The defendant father made multiple subsequent applications to vary the custody order, initially arguing under Mohammedan law that his right to custody arose when the child reached age seven. After failing in earlier applications and an appeal, the defendant applied again in 1941, this time arguing for the first time that English law, not Mohammedan law, should govern custody. The child was the daughter of Mohammedan parents, with the father being Somali and the grandmother Masai.

Issues

  1. What law is applicable to questions of guardianship and custody of minor children of Mohammedan parents in the Colony?

Orders

  • Application dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Family Law — Guardianship and Custody — Choice of Law — Mohammedan Children
Questions of guardianship and custody of minor children of Mohammedan parents are to be determined by courts according to English law, not Mohammedan law.
Statutory Interpretation — Judicial Precedent — Binding Authority
Where binding precedent establishes that courts exercise jurisdiction over custody matters according to English law, that principle must be followed regardless of the religious law applicable to the parties.

Cases cited (5)

  • Mbaruk bin Diwansap v Hamsini bin Jumbe Kimeneta (11 K.L.R. 56)
  • Hamisi bin Ali v Mariamu binti Ali (12 K.L.R. 51)
  • Sharif Abdullah v Zwena bingi Abedi (Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1923)
  • Fazalan Bibi v Tehran Bibi (8 E.A.L.R. 200)
  • CA. No. 13 of 1941

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nana v Mohamed Hassan (Civil Case No. 65 of 1932) [1942] EACA 2 (1 January 1942)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.