Wakilii

Nangosha v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Cause No. 229 of 2018)

High Court · [2021] UGHCCD 9 · 2021 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms under the Constitution and damages arising from illegal removal from payroll and forced retirement from UPDF
Decision
Application granted with declarations and orders for payment of unpaid salaries, gratuity, pension, housing allowance, general damages, interest, and costs

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the declaration of the applicant as Absent Without Official Leave while he was on duty at Junior Staff College was illegal, and his subsequent removal from the payroll and forced retirement without justification were unconstitutional and illegal. The respondent was ordered to pay unpaid salaries for the period the applicant was illegally off the payroll, gratuity based on 16 years of service less amounts already paid, pension arrears, housing allowance, and general damages.

Outcome

Application granted with declarations and orders for payment of unpaid salaries, gratuity, pension, housing allowance, general damages, interest, and costs

Facts

The applicant joined UPDF in 2001 and served until 2017. While attending training at Kabamba Training School in December 2005, he was recalled, detained for two months without trial, and subsequently hospitalised. In June 2006, he was declared AWOL while still under medical treatment. In February 2007, he was transferred to Junior Staff College, Jinja as Quarter Master. In April 2007, the Field Engineering Regiment again declared him AWOL and struck him off the payroll despite his being on duty at Jinja. He remained off the payroll for over ten years, from April 2007 to November 2017, when he was reinstated for one month and then discharged without having applied for retirement. He received only partial gratuity covering six years instead of his full sixteen years of service.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicant was illegally declared Absent Without Official Leave (AWOL).
  2. Whether the Applicant was illegally struck off the UPDF pay roll.
  3. Whether the Applicant was illegally retired from the UPDF.
  4. Whether the Applicant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Orders

  • Declaration that the action of the Field Engineering Regiment - Masaka declaring the Applicant Absent Without Official Leave (AWOL) when he was on duty at the Junior Staff College- Jinja was illegal.
  • Declaration that the act of retiring the Applicant from the UPDF service without any justifiable reason was unconstitutional and illegal.
  • Respondent to pay the Applicant all his unpaid salaries from 15th April 2007 to 30th November 2017 amounting to UGX 92,432,970.
  • Respondent to pay the Applicant his gratuity for 16 years of service, with amounts already paid deducted from the total due.
  • All the Applicant's pension arrears to be paid and he is to be put on the pension pay roll.
  • Respondent to pay the Applicant housing allowance for a two bedroomed house for the period of default.
  • Respondent to pay the Applicant general damages of UGX 70,000,000.
  • Interest at 8% per annum on all monetary awards from the date of ruling until payment in full.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the application.

Rules and key headnotes

Administrative Law — Military Personnel — Unlawful Removal from Payroll — Absent Without Official Leave Declaration
A military officer serving at an assigned duty station cannot lawfully be declared Absent Without Official Leave by a different unit, and removal from the payroll on that basis is illegal and violates the officer's rights.
Employment & Labour — Military Service — Forced Retirement — Absence of Application
The discharge of a serving military officer who has not applied for retirement and without justifiable reason is unconstitutional and illegal.
Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Effect of Failure to File Reply — Deemed Admissions
Where a respondent is served with an application and affidavit but opts not to file a reply, all facts stated in the application and accompanying affidavit are deemed admitted under Order 8 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, save as against persons under disability.
Employment & Labour — Military Service — Terminal Benefits — Gratuity and Pension Entitlement
A military officer who serves for at least thirteen years' reckonable service and is discharged is entitled to pension and gratuity computed in accordance with the UPDF (Pensions and Gratuities) Regulations, based on the full period of service and not merely the period before unlawful removal from the payroll.
Employment & Labour — Military Service — Housing Allowance — Entitlement When Not Accommodated
Under Regulation 34(4) of the UPDF (Conditions of Service) (Officers) Regulations, an officer who is not provided with quarters is entitled to a housing allowance calculated according to rank, and such allowance is payable for the period the officer was not accommodated.
Damages & Quantum — General Damages — Unlawful Administrative Action — Compensation for Stress and Inconvenience
General damages are awarded to compensate a plaintiff for injury, stress, and inconvenience suffered as a result of unlawful administrative action, and the quantum should reflect the circumstances of the case including mitigating factors such as partial payment of terminal benefits.
Damages & Quantum — Aggravated Damages — Absence of Malice or Ill-Will
Aggravated damages are not awarded where the defendant's conduct, though unlawful, does not exhibit malice, ill-will, or persistence in falsehood, and where mitigating factors such as partial payment of benefits are present.

Legislation cited (23)

Cases cited (14)

  • Prof Oloka Onyango & Others v The Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 6 of 2014)
  • H.G. Gandesha & another v G.J Lutaya (SCCA No. 14 of 1989)
  • Lt. Col Levy Vicent Mugyenyi & 51 Ors v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Application No. 300 of 2013)
  • Major Noel Drago Nuwe v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Cause No. 428 of 2017)
  • Omunyokol Akol Johnson v Attorney General (Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2012)
  • Interfreight Forwarders (U) Ltd v East African Development Bank (SCCA No. 33 of 1992)
  • Fredrick Zaabwe v Orient Bank Ltd (SCCA No. 4 of 2007)
  • General David Sejusa v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Cause No. 176 of 2015)
  • Asobasi Daniel Okumu v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Application No. 43 of 2016)
  • Robert Coussens v Attorney General (SCCA No. 08 of 1999)
  • Kibimba Rice Ltd v Umar Salim (SCCA No. 17 of 1992)
  • Takiya Kashwahiri & Another v Kajungu Denis (CACA No. 85 of 2011)
  • Ntabgoba v Editor-in-chief of the New Vision & Another [2004] 2 EA 234
  • Francis Butagira v Deborah Mukasa (SCCA No. 6 of 1989)

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nangosha v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Cause No. 229 of 2018) [2021] UGHCCD 9 (26 February 2021)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.