Naomi Karugaba v Ronnie Rogers Amone and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 206 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application for stay of execution dismissed as overtaken by events. The court had previously heard and determined a related taxation reference from which the stay application arose, rendering the stay application moot. No order as to costs.
Outcome
Application dismissed as overtaken by events following determination of underlying taxation reference
Facts
The applicant sought a stay of execution against enforcement of a decree in Civil Suit No. 372 of 2017. The application arose from Execution Miscellaneous Application No. 0010 of 2025. When the matter came up for hearing in July 2025, the court elected to first deal with Taxation Reference No. 0001 of 2024, from which the stay application arose. The taxation reference was heard and a ruling delivered on 1 July 2025. That decision rendered the stay application overtaken by events.
Issues
- Whether the application for stay of execution should be granted given that a related taxation reference had been determined
Orders
- Application dismissed
- No order as to costs
Legislation cited (7)
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.