Home › Case law › Naphatal Were and Another v Attorney General (Consolidated Constitutional Application No. 42 of 2012; Consolidated Constitutional Application No. 52 of 2012)
Naphatal Were and Another v Attorney General (Consolidated Constitutional Application No. 42 of 2012; Consolidated Constitutional Application No. 52 of 2012)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the DPP exercised prosecutorial discretion lawfully; charging two of several suspects was not discrimination, and a complainant's request to charge did not constitute unlawful direction or control.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Naphatal Were and Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.