Nashaba Paddy v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 39 of 2000)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 2 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that breaches of confession-recording guidelines do not bar an extra-judicial statement that was made voluntarily and confirmed accurate; conviction for aggravated robbery upheld.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Nashaba Paddy applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.