Nassali & 5 Others v Lukwago (Civil Suit 185 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court held that land bequeathed under a will to a deceased parent vested in all his children equally upon his death, notwithstanding that the certificate of title was registered in the name of one child as heir. The heir held the land in trust for all beneficiaries. Where the heir sold the land without proper distribution of proceeds, the court ordered him to pay each of the thirteen other beneficiaries their unpaid beneficial share calculated by dividing the sale proceeds equally among all fourteen children, with the heir entitled to an additional 1% under Succession Act s.27.
Outcome
Defendant ordered to pay each of thirteen beneficiaries UGX 67,000,000 within six months in two equal installments
Facts
The late James Kiggundu was bequeathed fifty decimals of land under his father Ssezi Musoke's probated will. James Kiggundu died on 8 August 1998 leaving fourteen children by different mothers. His father died on 1 February 1999. The Defendant was installed as heir of James Kiggundu. On 4 April 2011, the surviving executor of Ssezi Musoke's will handed the certificate of title for the suit land to the Defendant, already registered in his sole name. The Defendant sold the land. He initially told his siblings he had sold it for UGX 145,000,000 and gave each UGX 10,000,000. The Plaintiffs later learned he had sold it for UGX 1,100,000,000 (in two phases: UGX 300,000,000 and UGX 800,000,000) and demanded their proper share. The Defendant claimed the land was his exclusively because the title was in his name and that he gave each sibling UGX 50,000,000 out of generosity.
Issues
- Whether the suit land was part of the estate of the late James Kiggundu.
- Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to a claim of UGX 325,714,284 as pleaded in the plaint.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Land comprised in Kyadondo Block 222 plot 3436 formed the estate of the late James Kiggundu.
- Each of the fourteen beneficiaries of the estate of the late James Kiggundu was entitled to a beneficial share of UGX 77,000,000, save for the Defendant who is entitled to UGX 88,000,000 (the extra being 1% of total proceeds as the heir).
- The Defendant shall give each of the thirteen beneficiaries UGX 67,000,000 (as they already received UGX 10,000,000).
- The monies shall be paid to individual beneficiaries within six months from the date of judgment and in any case not later than 10 April 2025 in two equal installments, the first being paid not later than 10 January 2025.
- No damages awarded to the Plaintiffs.
- Each party to bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Cases cited (1)
- Fr. Narsensio Begumisa & Ors v Eric Tibebaga (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2022)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.