Nassiwa Hadijah and Another v Mascot Logistics Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 397 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court dismissed consolidated applications for stay of execution of a decree arising from Civil Suit No. 70 of 2023. The applications were rendered moot because the court had already granted the applicants' separate applications to set aside the underlying ex parte judgment. With no decree in existence to execute, the stay applications had no foundation and were dismissed, with each party bearing own costs.
Outcome
Applications for stay of execution dismissed as moot following setting aside of underlying ex parte judgment
Facts
The late Ssesebwe Vincent Salongo's estate was under administration by Nassiwa Hadijah and Nalwadda Bella Brenda, after Nakalema Hellen's letters of administration were revoked in Civil Suit No. 535 of 2022. Mascot Logistics Limited filed Civil Suit No. 70 of 2023 against the administrators seeking recovery of UGX 371,837,704 allegedly taken by the deceased for personal use. The suit proceeded ex parte and judgment was entered on 20 March 2025 ordering payment of the principal sum, general damages of UGX 20,000,000, and costs, totalling approximately UGX 469,324,736.64. The respondent commenced execution proceedings. Both Nassiwa Hadijah and Nakalema Hellen filed separate applications to set aside the ex parte judgment and separate applications for stay of execution pending determination of the setting aside applications. The court consolidated the two stay applications for hearing.
Issues
- Whether the consolidated applications for stay of execution should be granted pending determination of applications to set aside the ex parte judgment.
- Whether the applications for stay of execution became moot following the grant of the application to set aside the ex parte judgment.
Orders
- The consolidated Application is hereby dismissed.
- Each party to bear own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- National Enterprise Corporation v Mukisa Foods (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 7 of 1998)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.