Naturinda v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 25 of 2015)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that an appellate court re-sentencing afresh after an Article 23(8) nullity may lawfully arrive at a sentence identical to the trial court's.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Naturinda applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.