Home › Case law › Nekuusa and Another v Zimula and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 368 of 2020)
Nekuusa and Another v Zimula and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 368 of 2020)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the plaintiff bank's advocates cannot be added as defendants in the same suit, being neither necessary nor proper parties and joinder offending advocate-client privilege.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Nekuusa and Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.