Wakilii
HomeCase law › Nuru Kaaya v Crescent Transportation Ltd [2003] UGSC 13

Nuru Kaaya v Crescent Transportation Ltd [2003] UGSC 13

Citation: [2003] UGSC 13 Court: Supreme Court Decided: 11 March 2003 Jurisdiction: Uganda

Legal issues

Civil ProcedureConstitutional Law

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

Where a trial aborts before the defence gives evidence, an appellate court must remit for completion rather than enter final judgment on one party's evidence alone.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Nuru Kaaya applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.