Nuwagaba v Makerere University (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 362 OF 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that an applicant demonstrates sufficient reason for extension of time when the tribunal fails to provide a copy of the ruling within the statutory appeal period. The court cannot expect a party to formulate grounds of appeal without access to the full written decision. Application allowed.
Outcome
Applicant granted extension of time to appeal against Makerere University Staff Tribunal decision to the High Court
Facts
The applicant was dismissed from Makerere University service on 23 May 2018. He successfully appealed to the University Staff Tribunal, which set aside the dismissal on 16 April 2019. The tribunal found the applicant was treated unjustly and unfairly, and that natural justice was violated. However, the tribunal directed a fresh disciplinary hearing within 60 days. On the day of ruling delivery, the tribunal chairman only read the concluding part, citing time constraints and the need for corrections. The applicant was told he would receive corrected copies later. The ruling was delivered on 16 April 2019 but the applicant did not receive a copy until 21 May 2019, after the statutory appeal period had expired. The applicant sent multiple SMS messages to the tribunal registrar from 2 May 2019 seeking the ruling. By the time he received the ruling on 21 May 2019, the statutory deadline of 17 May 2019 had passed.
Issues
- Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reason to warrant extension of time to file an appeal against the Makerere University Staff Tribunal decision.
Orders
- Application for extension of time allowed.
- Time to appeal extended accordingly.
- Costs to be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 s.96
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature (Amendment) Act 2002 s.3(7)
- Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules 2009 r.5
- Civil Procedure Rules SI 71-1 Order 52 r.1
- Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act
Cases cited (3)
- Mugo and Others v Wanjiru [1971] EA 481
- Delvi v Diamond Concrete Company [1974] EA 493
- Hannington Wasswa v Onyango Ochola [1992-1993] HCB 103
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.