Nzitatira & Anor v Sebisogi (Civil Appeal No. 008 of 2008)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Appeal dismissed with costs. Court held that the plaintiff respondent, a 90-year-old woman, validly repossessed land she had given as a licence to her deceased grandson who died intestate and unmarried. The appellants' claim to have purchased the land from the grandson's cohabitant was invalid as there was no recognized marriage and the transaction was tainted with fraud, having been conducted without involving the plaintiff or family members despite their proximity.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; appellants ordered to vacate land immediately and permanent injunction granted in favour of respondent
Facts
The respondent plaintiff, a woman over 90 years old, sued her biological son and his wife for trespass. She had given land to her grandson Dusabimana Peter as a licence to build a house because he faced threats of ejection. The grandson died intestate and unmarried, having cohabited with one Mukanjera Imerida but not in a recognized marriage. The plaintiff repossessed the land after his death, removed the house and resumed cultivation. The second appellant/defendant claimed to have purchased the land from Imerida Mukanjera, asserting it was Imerida's marriage gift. The trial magistrate found for the plaintiff, holding the land belonged to her and the defendants were trespassers. The defendants appealed.
Issues
- Whether the trial magistrate erred in evaluating the defendants' evidence in isolation of the plaintiff's overwhelming evidence.
- Whether the suit land belonged to the plaintiff respondent.
- Whether the defendants/appellants trespassed on the suit land.
- Whether the transaction whereby the second appellant purchased the land from Imerida Mukanjera was valid.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- The Defendants/Appellants shall immediately stop trespassing on the Plaintiff's/Respondent's land.
- The Respondent or her agents and/or successors are entitled to vacant possession of the suit land.
- A permanent injunction prohibiting the Appellants from use, occupation or in any other way dealing with the suit land is hereby granted.
- The Appellants shall jointly and severally pay the Respondent the costs incurred in the Lower Court and this Appeal.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.