Wakilii

Nzitatira and Another v Foibi Sebisogi (Civil Appeal No. 008 of 2008)

High Court · [2011] UGHC 203 · 2011 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Appeal from Kisoro Grade I Court civil suit for trespass and recovery of land
Decision
Appellants ordered to vacate the suit land immediately; permanent injunction granted restraining them from any use or dealing with the land; respondent entitled to vacant possession.

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Grade I Magistrate's finding that the respondent owned the suit land and the appellants were trespassers. The respondent had granted her grandson Dusabe Peter a licence to use the land, which was extinguished upon his death. The purported sale by Dusabe's cohabitant Imerida Mukanjera to the second appellant was invalid, as Imerida had no lawful ownership. The transaction was tainted with fraud, conducted without involving the rightful owner or family members. The appellants were ordered to vacate immediately and permanently enjoined from any dealings with the land.

Outcome

Appellants ordered to vacate the suit land immediately; permanent injunction granted restraining them from any use or dealing with the land; respondent entitled to vacant possession.

Facts

The respondent, a woman stated to be over 90 years old, sued her biological son (first appellant) and his wife (second appellant) for trespassing on her land. The respondent had granted her grandson Dusabe Peter a licence to build on the land because he was under threat from the first appellant. Dusabe died intestate and unmarried, having cohabited with Imerida Mukanjera. After Dusabe's death, the respondent resumed cultivating the land. The second appellant claimed to have purchased the land from Imerida Mukanjera, asserting it was a marriage gift to Imerida from the respondent. The trial court found for the respondent, holding that the land belonged to her, the appellants were trespassers, and ordered them to vacate. The appellants appealed. The High Court found no valid marriage between Dusabe and Imerida, and held that the purported sale by Imerida to the second appellant was invalid and tainted with fraud, as Imerida had no ownership interest and the transaction excluded the rightful owner and family members.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit land belonged to the plaintiff/respondent.
  2. Whether the defendants/appellants trespassed on the suit land.
  3. Whether the purported sale of land by Imerida Mukanjera to the second appellant was valid.
  4. What remedies are available to the parties.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Defendants/Appellants shall immediately stop trespassing on the Plaintiff's/Respondent's land.
  • Respondent or her agents and/or successors are entitled to vacant possession of the suit land.
  • Permanent injunction prohibiting the Appellants from use, occupation or in any other way dealing with the suit land.
  • Appellants shall jointly and severally pay the Respondent the costs incurred in the Lower Court and this Appeal.

Rules and key headnotes

Licences — Revocability — Extinguishment by Death of Licensee
A licence to occupy land granted by an owner to a family member is extinguished upon the death of the licensee, and the land reverts to the licensor who may resume possession and cultivation.
Sale of Land — Validity — Absence of Title in Vendor
A purported sale of land by a person who has no ownership interest in the land is invalid and confers no title on the purchaser.
Cohabitation — Legal Status — No Marriage Gift
Where a man and woman cohabit without a valid recognised marriage, land belonging to the man's family cannot be presumed to be a marriage gift to the woman, and she acquires no ownership interest in the land merely by virtue of the cohabitation.
Fraudulent Transactions — Sale of Family Land Without Involving Rightful Owners
A transaction for the sale of family land conducted without involving the known rightful owner and in the face of the owner's known claim of ownership is tainted with fraud and will be set aside.
Appellate Review — Duty of First Appellate Court
A first appellate court has the duty to retry the case by subjecting the evidence on record to fresh evaluation, making its own findings of fact and drawing inferences, while keeping in mind that it neither saw nor heard the witnesses and must consider their demeanour as assessed by the trial court.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Nzitatira and Another v Foibi Sebisogi (Civil Appeal No. 008 of 2008) [2011] UGHC 203 (3 August 2011)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.