Odomoch v Jinja District Local Government (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 49 OF 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that leave to amend should be granted where the amendment enables the court to properly determine the real questions in controversy between the parties and does not prejudice the respondent. The contested factual dispute regarding the date of receipt of a transfer letter should be tested during the main judicial review hearing, not resolved at the amendment stage. Application granted with costs.
Outcome
Leave granted to amend notice of motion and affidavit in the underlying judicial review application
Facts
The applicant filed a judicial review application (Miscellaneous Cause No. 39 of 2016) against Jinja District Local Government. When the matter came for hearing, applicant's counsel sought to orally amend the notice of motion and affidavit. The respondent objected, requiring a formal application. The applicant then filed this formal application seeking to amend paragraph (d) of the grounds in the notice of motion and paragraphs 3 and 11 of the supporting affidavit, claiming typographical errors. The respondent opposed only the amendment to paragraph 11, which concerned the date the applicant received a transfer letter. The original affidavit stated receipt on 27 May 2016; the applicant sought to change this to 17 June 2016. The respondent claimed the applicant received the letter on 2 June 2016 and again on 16 June 2016, but never on 17 June 2016, and alleged the amendment was in bad faith.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted unconditional leave to amend her application for judicial review and accompanying affidavit.
Orders
- Application for amendment granted.
- Costs awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules O.6 r.19
- Civil Procedure Rules O.6 r.31
Cases cited (2)
- Gaso Transport Services (Bus) Ltd v Obene (1990-1994) EA 88
- Eastern Bakery v Castelino [1958] EA 461
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.