Oese v Akol (Civil Appeal 336 of 2019)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
On second appeal, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's finding that the respondent owned the disputed nine gardens and affirmed UGX 9,000,000 general damages for trespass.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Oese applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.