Official Receiver v Colonial Blanket Syndicate (Bankruptcy Cause No. 31-1936)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that costs are an indemnity and the successful party can recover from the unsuccessful party only what he is himself liable to pay his advocate. Where the Official Receiver employed an advocate on terms limiting remuneration to Sh. 300, the defendants were liable only for that sum plus disbursements, not the full taxed amount of Sh. 589. The taxing officer was entitled to consider the agreement between advocate and client, and must satisfy himself not only that work was done but that it was reasonable and necessary.
Outcome
Review of taxation dismissed; defendants liable for Sh. 412 as taxed costs
Facts
The debtor was adjudicated bankrupt on 15 January 1937. During public examination it emerged that on 15 October 1936 he had transferred goods worth Sh. 1,395 to the Colonial Blanket Syndicate in purported discharge of his liability. The Official Receiver, as trustee, applied for authority to employ an advocate to recover the goods or their value, stating estimated costs of Sh. 300. An order was made authorizing expenditure not exceeding £15. The advocate agreed with the Official Receiver to conduct proceedings for Sh. 300 as regards the bankrupt's estate. Judgment was obtained declaring the transfer void as a fraudulent preference and ordering the defendants to pay Sh. 1,395 plus taxed costs. On taxation, the advocate's bill was taxed at Sh. 589, but the Acting Registrar, having regard to the agreement limiting remuneration to Sh. 300, allowed only Sh. 300 profit costs plus Sh. 112 disbursements against the defendants. The Official Receiver applied to review this taxation.
Issues
- Whether the Official Receiver could recover from the unsuccessful defendant more than the limited amount he had agreed to pay his advocate.
- Whether the taxing officer was entitled to have regard to the agreement between the advocate and the Official Receiver when taxing costs as between party and party.
- Whether the taxing officer's duty extends beyond verifying that work was done to determining whether it was reasonable and necessary.
Orders
- Application for review of taxation dismissed.
- Costs of the application to be paid out of the estate of the bankrupt.
- Taxation by the Acting Registrar allowing Sh. 412 as taxed costs confirmed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1930 s.22(10)
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1930 s.57
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1930 s.101(1)
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1930 s.116
- Bankruptcy Rules r.77(2)
- Bankruptcy Rules r.79
- Bankruptcy Rules r.83
- Rules of Court 1916 Part XIII s.111 rr.33-36
- Civil Procedure Code s.27
Cases cited (8)
- Harold v Smith (1858) 5 H & N 381
- Richardson v Richardson (1895) 64 LJ P 119
- Gundry v Sainsbury [1910] 1 KB 645
- Ward v Lawson (1873) LR 8 Ch App 65
- Re Duncan [1892] 1 QB 879
- Smith v Buller (1874) LR 19 Eq 473
- Re Lavey [1921] 1 KB 344
- Adams v London Motor Builders [1921] 1 KB 495
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.