Okulu Jimmy v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2013)

Observed later treatment

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

Holding

The Court of Appeal held that the trial Judge's failure to take into account the period the appellant spent on remand, as required by Article 23(8) of the Constitution, rendered the 15-year sentence illegal. Invoking section 11 of the Judicature Act, the Court set aside that sentence and, after weighing aggravating and mitigating factors and the range of sentences in comparable aggravated robbery cases, imposed 10 years imprisonment, deducting the 5 months spent on remand to give a term of 9 years and 7 months from the date of conviction. The compensation order of Shs. 13,505,500 was maintained.

Outcome

Sentence reduced from 15 years to an effective term of 9 years and 7 months imprisonment; compensation order maintained.

Facts

The appellant, a security guard employed by Securiko Uganda Limited, was assigned to guard Busiro Enterprises Ltd. On 19 January 2013 he escorted others distributing beer for sale. On the return journey along the Masaka-Kyotera road, the appellant alighted from the truck, put the driver at gunpoint and demanded the day's sales proceeds. He was given sums amounting to Shs. 13,505,000 and Shs. 15,000,000, then ordered the others to drive off. The matter was reported to police; the appellant was arrested on 3 April 2013 at his home village in Otuke District. An SLR rifle with no ammunition was recovered. He pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, was convicted on his own plea, and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. He appealed against sentence only.

Issues

1. Whether the sentence of 15 years imprisonment was illegal for failure to take into account the period the appellant spent on remand under Article 23(8) of the Constitution.
2. Whether the sentence of 15 years imprisonment was harsh in the circumstances.

Orders

• Sentence of 15 years imprisonment set aside as illegal.
• Appellant sentenced to 10 years imprisonment, less 5 months spent on remand, to serve 9 years and 7 months from 10/9/2013.
• Order for compensation of the victim in the sum of Shs. 13,505,500 maintained pursuant to section 286(4) of the Penal Code Act.

Rules and key headnotes

Legislation cited (3)

• Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(8)
• Judicature Act s.11
• Penal Code Act s.286(4)

Cases cited (4)

• Rwabugande Moses v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2014)
• Adama Jino v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 2006)
• Pte Kusemererwa and Another v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 83 of 2010)
• Ouke Sam v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 251 of 2002)

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

• Arac v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 297 of 2014)

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.