Omirambe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 495 of 2017)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A rape sentence is not manifestly excessive where the trial judge exercised sentencing discretion judiciously, though an arithmetic error in computing the term must be corrected.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Omirambe applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.