Onkoba v Regina (Criminal Appeal No. 695 of 1951)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that failure to comply fully with section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not per se invalidate proceedings provided it has not occasioned a miscarriage of justice. Where there is sufficient material on the record for the appellate court to properly exercise its judgment, non-compliance with section 197 is curable under section 381 and not fatal to conviction. Appeal dismissed.
Outcome
Conviction upheld despite procedural irregularities in recording of evidence
Facts
The appellant was convicted by the Resident Magistrate's Court at Kericho. On appeal, it emerged that the trial magistrate had failed to record the evidence of witnesses in full as required by section 194 of the Criminal Procedure Code, recording only the gist of the evidence. The magistrate also failed to write a judgment embodying the substance of the evidence as required by section 197 where evidence is taken but not recorded in full. The sole issue on appeal was whether these procedural failures invalidated the conviction.
Issues
- Whether failure by a magistrate to record evidence of witnesses in full and to write judgment as required by section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code invalidates the proceedings.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Criminal Procedure Code s.197
- Criminal Procedure Code s.194
- Criminal Procedure Code s.381
Cases cited (1)
- Rex v Hassain Merali (13 EACA 85)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.