Home › Case law › Oroma & 2 Others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 146 of 2019; Criminal Appeal 176 of 2020)
Oroma & 2 Others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 146 of 2019; Criminal Appeal 176 of 2020)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that conviction for aggravated robbery stood on a cautioned single identifying witness, but the 22-year sentence was illegal for incorrect remand deduction.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Oroma & 2 Others applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.