Oroma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 27 of 2016)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a defilement conviction may rest on the victim's sole testimony, and Rwabugande's remand-deduction rule does not apply retrospectively to earlier sentences.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Oroma applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.