Oryem v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 22 of 2004)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Conviction quashed where a stranger witness identified the accused without an identification parade and the corroborating circumstantial evidence was itself unsupported.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Oryem applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.