Otim v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 61 of 2019)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Aggravated robbery conviction quashed where the prosecution failed to produce the cell phone tracking records that alone placed the appellant at the scene.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Otim applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.