Parish v Indonesia (Communication 38 of 1990)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Commission declared the communication inadmissible on the ground that it was directed against Indonesia, a state non-party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Commission has no jurisdiction over states that have not ratified the Charter.
Outcome
Communication inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction over non-party state
Facts
Wesley Parish filed a communication with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights alleging illegalities committed by Indonesia. The communication was considered at the Commission's Seventh Ordinary Session held from 18 to 28 April 1990. Indonesia was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time.
Issues
- Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction to consider a communication directed against a state that is not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
Orders
- Communication declared inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 30
- Rules of Procedure of the African Commission Article 101
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.