Pastor Daniel Walugembe v Moses Besimira Karendere (Civil Suit 109 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that statements made in judicial proceedings, including affidavits filed in court, are protected by absolute privilege and cannot form the basis of a defamation action, regardless of their falsity or malice. The defendant's affidavit in reply filed in separate court proceedings was absolutely privileged. The plaintiff's defamation suit was dismissed as the action was completely barred in law.
Outcome
Plaintiff's defamation suit dismissed on grounds of absolute privilege
Facts
The plaintiff, an international pastor and businessman, sued the defendant for defamation arising from an affidavit in reply filed by the defendant in Nabweru Chief Magistrates Court Family Application No. 001 of 2019. The affidavit stated that an applicant had fraudulently sold the defendant's matrimonial house and attached a sale agreement marked as annexure F, which identified the plaintiff as the alleged purchaser. The plaintiff claimed these statements were defamatory, lowering his reputation among right-thinking members of society. The defendant filed a written statement of defence relying on absolute judicial privilege and justification. The defendant and his counsel failed to appear at the hearing, and the plaintiff proceeded exparte.
Issues
- Whether the defendant's publication was defamatory of the plaintiff.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Suit dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
Cases cited (2)
- Geoffrey Ssejjoba v Rev. Patrick Rwabigonji (HCCS No. 1 of 1976)
- The Red Pepper Publications Ltd & Anor v Rtd. Chief Justice Samuel W. Wako Wambuzi (CACA No. 128 of 2017)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.